India on Thursday reiterated it would not sign a key commercial contract with cricket’s world governing body despite threats it could lose the right to stage the 2011 cricket World Cup as a result.
The International Cricket Council (ICC) said on Wednesday that all nations had to sign the Members Participation Agreement (MPA) binding them to all ICC events until 2015, but India was playing spoilsport.
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) previously said it would not sign the MPA until certain clauses were amended, stressing the contract would badly affect its own commercial deals worth a reported one billion dollars over the next four years.
The ICC president Percy Sonn said in a statement that if the BCCI failed to sign up, it “could not continue as one of the joint hosts of the 2011 World Cup, thus putting the entire tournament in jeopardy.” India, which hosts the ICC’s Champions Trophy from Saturday, won the right to hold the 2011 World Cup jointly with South Asian neighbours Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh.
“We have decided we will not sign the MPA in its current form,” BCCI secretary Niranjan Shah told AFP on Thursday. “That is the decision taken by the BCCI. We have been given a deadline till Monday to inform the ICC of our objections and we will meet that date. As of now we are not in a position to sign the MPA,” he added.
BCCI vice-president Lalit Modi was even more categorical. “A few nations may have signed the MPA but that is not our concern,” he told reporters after a meeting of the BCCI’s top brass in Mumbai earlier this week. “We are not forced to play ICC events. Only if conditions suit us, we will play,” he told.
“The MPA in its existing form affects BCCI’s commercial interests, gives ICC the right to change agreements unilaterally and affects the players’ interests. The MPA would affect the BCCI and the players’ interests for a period ranging from six to nine months. We are very unhappy with the way the MPA has been drafted,” he added.
India helps to drive cricket’s economics, as five of the ICC’s six main sponsors are Indian firms or the Indian branches of international businesses. If the country refuses to play ball, the ICC’s proposed one-billion-dollar deal to sell broadcasting and sponsorship rights could be affected.
The ICC’s current 550-million-dollar, seven-year deal with Global Cricket Corporation, a venture owned by Rupert Murdoch’s News International, expires after the 2007 World Cup in the Caribbean. The ICC hopes to double that amount in a new eight-year deal that covers 18 tournaments, including two World Cups, three Champions Trophies and the first two Twenty20 world championships. Other events include the ICC Trophy for associate members and the under-19 World Cups.
Source:The NewsMore on:icc, India, World Cup
Thank you for reading this post. You can now Leave A Comment (0) or Leave A Trackback.
Post InfoThis entry was posted on Friday, October 6th, 2006 and is filed under General.
Previous Post: Yousuf named Pakistan captain after Younis quits »
Next Post: ICC defends position in Inzamam disrepute case »
Read MoreRelated Reading:
- Miandad questions rationale of ICL ban
- Changes in PCB
- PCB officials discuss India’s tour with High Commission
- Qadir appointed Pakistan’s chief selector
- Murali and Mendis rout Zimbabwe
- Southee swings New Zealand into strong position
- It could get dark by 3.30 pm - Pietersen
- India win by 16 runs in fading light
- Katich the key as wickets tumble
- Storm halts South Africa progress