Ganguly ditched me: Narendra Hirwani

Written by Kashif Aziz on April 17th, 2006   (128 views)

Ex-India leg-spinner Narendra Hirwani says that former captain Sourav Ganguly ditched him after promising to play him in all three Tests against Australia in 2001 when he was trying to stage a comeback.

Hirwani, who took a world-record 16 wickets on Test debut in 1988, was called for a two-day trial in Mumbai before the first Test against Australia and stunned everyone, including Sachin Tendulkar and Rahul Dravid, with his penetrative bowling at the nets before the match.

‘Before the team for the first Test was announced, Ganguly told me that I would play all three Tests, leave alone worrying about selection (for just one Test),’ Hirwani told IANS in an interview here.

‘But for some reason I wasn’t picked. Then, coach John Wright told me that I would be playing the second Test (in Kolkata). I was again not picked,’ said the 37-year-old Indore-based spinner who retired this February after 22 years of first-class cricket.

Then, Hirwani, one of most prolific wicket takers in domestic cricket, was dropped from the third Test in Chennai of a series that India won 2-1 to stun world champions Australia.

After being ignored for the first Test in Mumbai and before the second Test, Hirwani was picked for the Board President’s XI against the Australians in a three-day game in Delhi where the squad for the second Test in Kolkata was to be announced.

Hirwani took eight wickets in the match, but to his misfortune the squad was surprisingly announced on the second day itself, after Hirwani had taken three wickets in the first innings. He was not selected.

‘I earned those eight wickets - they were not gifted to me — and everyone was surprised (by my good bowling),’ he said.

Asked how Ganguly could give an assurance of picking him in the team when there were five selectors, the Hirwani said: ‘It is because it’s the captain who picks the playing eleven.’

Hirwani, who was born in Gorakhpur in Uttar Pradesh, is angry with Ganguly for not living up to his words.

‘No one told me why I was not picked. Ganguly can’t see me in the eyes today. They should have at least given me a chance to fail!’ he said sitting in his house in Sukhliya Gram.

Incidentally, Hirwani’s coach-cum-mentor-cum-guide Sanjay Jagdale was at the time one of the national selectors who was supposed to take up the cases of central zone players as per the perceived notion. But the humble Hirwani defends Jagdale.

‘He was my guru, how could he speak? It was for others (selectors) to speak for me. He is such an honest person, I can’t complain,’ said Hirwani about a man whom he had approached for guidance and coaching when he left Gorakhpur and settled down in Indore as a 16-year-old in 1984.

‘I didn’t have the guts to ask him why I was not picked because I come from a family where I was taught that one should not argue with one’s guru or elders,’ he stressed.

Hirwani, who is now taking up coaching and television assignments full time, burst on the international firmament with an amazing world-record 16 wickets against the West Indies in Chennai in 1988. India won and Hirwani was adjudged the Man of the Match.

A combination of shabby treatment from selectors over the years and a few injuries, more than lack of performances, ensured that the hard-working Hirwani played only 17 Tests (66 wickets) and 18 one-day internationals (23 wickets) between 1988 and 1996.

He feels that coming from a weak state, Madhya Pradesh, contributed to this, otherwise he says he was worth many more matches and wickets.

‘Of course, I had more potential than the number of wickets I took. I feel I only exhibited only 10 or 15 percent of my true potential. I was very hungry. My dream of taking wickets and winning matches for India were very big,’ he said.

Hirwani said that taking 16 wickets on debut became disadvantageous for him as people had started expecting too much from him every time he stepped on to the field.

In 167 first-class matches, Hirwani took 732 wickets and another 75 scalps in 70 limited overs matches, leaving an indelible stamp.

Source: Yahoo! News through IANS

More on:, , , ,

Technorati Tags: Ganguly, Australia, Mumbai

Thank you for reading this post. You can now Read Comments (5) or Leave A Trackback.

Post Info

This entry was posted on Monday, April 17th, 2006 and is filed under General.

Tagged with: , , , ,

You can follow any responses to this entry through the Comments Feed. You can Leave A Comment, or A Trackback.

Previous Post: Afridi urged to withdraw hasty decision »
Next Post: Malik outlawed from playing; Azhar to skipper Indian veterans in Wateen Cup »

Read More

Related Reading:

    5 Responses to “Ganguly ditched me: Narendra Hirwani

    • 1
      April 18th, 2006 05:21 GMT

      Fuking ganguly Doesnt now how to but still thinks he’s the best and doesn’t give other players a chance. They should nt worry about age these idiots think age is everything but fitness everything

    • 2
      April 18th, 2006 12:19 GMT

      Well its evident that Ganguly went for the young blod team with Harbhajan. The tables have turned on him since then in the same manner so no one should really complain.

    • 3
      April 19th, 2006 00:10 GMT

      ganguly is an ass hole .its jst because of jag mohan dalimiya he is became a international cricketer.he is always insecure of nice players.

    • 4
      April 20th, 2006 13:35 GMT

      I think Sourav Ganguly relied more on Harbhajan Singh & do remember Harbhajan emerged as a Match Winner(Turbanator) from the series in 2001.
      So I think better no comments on this issue.

    • 5
      April 20th, 2006 13:43 GMT

      I think Sourav relied on Bhajji…& it paid off India won the series…Bhajji emerged as the superstar.
      Moreover, its not only the captain, coach & the team mang decides the playing 11.
      Sourav has given his service to the Indian Team quite efficiently, India has performed quite well abroad as well as in the World Cup 2003. i think hez far better than AZHARUDDIN…not a DESH DROHI like him

    Subscribe without commenting

    Leave a Reply

    Note: Any comments are permitted only because the site owner is letting you post, and any comments could be removed for any reason at the absolute discretion of the site owner.